Ananymous sex chat Amsterdam cam web xxx
In fact, the Russians had signed a memorandum with the USA which specifically comitting Russia NOT to interfere with any US overflights, manned or not, over Syria (and vice versa).
While the Tomahawk cruise missile was developed in the 1980s, there is no reason to believe that the missiles used had exceeded their shelf live and there is even evidence that they were built in 2014. There is absolutely no basis to suspect that over half of the missiles fired simply spontaneously malfunctioned.
I do believe in this explanation and I will explain why in the political analysis below.
Explanation B: The Russians could not legally shoot down the US missiles.
The attack: American and Russian sources both agree on the following facts: 2 USN ships launched 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at the airfield in Syria.Some of these missiles were probably flying low enough not to be seen by Russian radars, unless the Russians had an AWACS in the air (I don’t know if they did).However, since the Russians were warned about the attack they had plenty of time to prepare their electronic warfare stations to “fry” and otherwise disable at least part of the cruise missiles. I do not know whether the Russian were technically unable to destroy and confuse the 23 missiles which reached the base or whether a political decision was taken to let less than half of the cruise missiles through in order to disguise the Russian role in the destruction of 36 missiles.There is no way to distinguish a chemical munition or a chemical attack by means of radar.Whatever option you chose, the Syrian government is obviously and self-evidently innocent of the accusation of having used chemical weapons. Also, and just for the record, the US had been considering exactly such a false flag attack in the past.
Search for Ananymous sex chat:
There is no footage showing any munitions or containers which would have delivered the toxic gas.